+-

Author Topic: The Truth's Rant And Rave Show: Now In Progress  (Read 66837 times)

0 Members and 46 Guests are viewing this topic.

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 722
  • Karma: +1773/-0
    • View Profile
Yeah, I'm not sure about Nole at Roland Garros.  I'm not sure he'll make the finals.  But let's see what the draw is like.  He has had some pretty good draws lately.  Too good, sometimes.  In some cases it has hurt him, I think.  Not enough semi-tough opponents before facing very tough opponents.

As for Rafa, he has to get past the QF.  Once he does, he'll have his 20 matches, and I think it will be tough for anyone to beat him over 5 sets.  Before that, especially early, a good clay player might upset him, even in best of 5, just because he hasn't played enough.  It is what I'm most worried about for him. 

It's not a confidence thing, it is staying at a high enough level throughout a match, which only comes after playing enough matches.  I think of it like this: One lapse during a 3 set match and you can survive, it might cost you a set, two can cost you the match.  5 sets gives you 2 lapses of survival, 3 can hurt you.  The question is that during his early matches can he keep the lapses down to 2 or  under?  Depends who he plays and how he and they play, obviously.  He is having some difficulty holding his serve, especially in key moments.  That also has to stop.

About 2 1/2 days till the draw general. :)

Respectfully,
masterclass
Legends of Tennis

  • Administrator
  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 28948
  • Karma: +38077/-0
  • CAMELOT: DAWN OF JUSTICE
  • Location: New Orleans
    • View Profile
    • Camelot Fantasy
great post as usual general masterclass



one thing about Rafa: he has had moments like this before to deal with. moments where he pretty much had to stop the slide and to also hold on to his strongholds.


he did that in hamburg as you will recall many moons ago.

he has also held back nole no less than 5 times at RG. and then he has that record in the finals at RG. he will have a huge mental edge going into that final.



but first things first as you have suggested: he has to get through the first few rounds and start to hit his normal stride.

  • Administrator
  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 28948
  • Karma: +38077/-0
  • CAMELOT: DAWN OF JUSTICE
  • Location: New Orleans
    • View Profile
    • Camelot Fantasy

  • Administrator
  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 28948
  • Karma: +38077/-0
  • CAMELOT: DAWN OF JUSTICE
  • Location: New Orleans
    • View Profile
    • Camelot Fantasy

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
Good day general hercules, Lady TT, and the rest.  Just about to have dinner. :)

RG draw in less than 3 days... :)

Anybody heard about Nishikori?  Is he going to play? If he is back to being healthy, he is a threat to upset almost anyone if he can get it done quickly.

Respectfully,
masterclass

It looks like he's going to play the French, according to this article.

Kei Nishikori Hunts for Scalps at French Open

http://blogs.wsj.com/scene/2014/05/20/kei-nishikori-hunts-for-scalps-at-french-open/

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
general masterclass is the foremost tennis analyst and a top flight tennis historian on the planet. he is the best that has ever been.


he calls it like it is. there is no spin. only unparalleled intelligence and analysis.

Thank you general and Lady TT.  Hopefully, I am still improving.  I have to admit I'm still a bit biased towards commenting and critiquing the great tennis players, because they have played great tennis more than the rest, and I am an unabashed fan of great tennis as shown by my Legends signature image.  :)

But when someone points  out that a non-top player played a great tennis match that I didn't see, I generally try to watch it, if it is available on a video clip.  So thanks to general CETSVids for those opportunities, even though I notice that Youtube has been removing videos at an alarming rate lately.  Have to catch them quickly.

Respectfully,
masterclass

It's difficult not to be biased with the caliber of tennis we've witnessed over the last decade, but I think you manage to  report fair and accurate analysis on all of the players, that in itself is a gift. It took me a while to figure out who you liked, but I think the bottom line is that you like great tennis, and that overrides any bias you may have towards a certain player. It's actually amazing how fair and objective you are. I wish I could do that.

It looks like, once again, CD and I are in another fight as to who's your biggest fan.

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
hate is just a wasted emotion that serves no constructive purpose.

we just happen to like some players more for various reasons.

Exactly. I don't know why people waste so much energy with it. I find it easier to stew for a minute, get over it, and put it behind me. I need to laugh and enjoy life, I don't have time for that kind of stuff.

I concur.  I expect people to celebrate their own player's victories, accomplishments, commiserate about their losses, etc. , what I would call normal fans. 

But there are so many that can't just do that.   I'm not sure what causes people to "dislike or hate" other players.  One may not like a player's particular style of play, or maybe certain mannerisms, or even actions on the court, but it so often goes beyond that.  They probably don't know them personally, and only see exterior glimpses, and don't know the context of what has been said or done in relation to their statements and actions.   For some, they must be derogatory or hateful toward another player or players, and fans of those players, sometimes in an apparent effort to elevate their own, or sometimes just to knock down the other.   It usually happens in the comparison type of threads, or in a match thread. 

It's probably unavoidable that fans of one might elevate or emphasize some accomplishments of their players to an extent, while diminishing the other player or players to an extent, but then it usually unfortunately becomes a slippery slope towards the ugly comments.   As time has passed, I have found it best not to attempt to discuss things with those types of people, as those discussions inevitably lead toward ill will, attacks and counter attacks.   I do feel I have to call out people sometimes when they make factual errors or draw "questionable" conclusions based on a selection of either dubious or selective facts.  But once I've done that, I don't argue about it. It's not worth it.  And many times I just don't bother.

I prefer to make my comments, concentrate on the relevant facts in a match or discussion, point out the good things the players have done, perhaps criticize what I see as some deficiencies of each player and try to do it in a manner that is productive rather than negative.   I generally prefer to post in analysis threads.

Sometimes I have fun with prediction threads, realizing that those are by their nature the most uncertain of all; nobody is going to predict correctly all of the time.  If you can do better than 50% than that is good.  And I've found that some can predict almost equally well, whether based on a feeling or on interpretation of historical events.  What I don't like is the people who have the nerve to deride various predictions and make fun of the people that make them either before or after (especially annoying), when they often lack the courage to predict themselves and put their opinions on the line.

Occasionally, I will start a "joke" thread, which may intentionally poke fun at  certain players, but it's meant to be all in good fun, not hateful by any means, though some people invariably will read into it otherwise.  So I tend not to start many threads of that type and I try not to focus only on one player, though admittedly the top players are most often the subjects. :)

Respectfully,
masterclass

I couldn't agree more. My mother used to say that if I loved someone, I was 100% in, but if I don't I'm indifferent to them, meaning I can still be happy for them, but I definitely won't hate them for pursuing their dream.

As it relates to tennis, it's no secret that Rafa is my absolute favorite, but then there are others that I like a lot, Andy, Berdych, Kei, Monaco, and Haas to name a few.

Still, there is no reason to denigrate other players, and although other players may have traits that I don't like as much, that doesn't translate into me hating them. Because, that's silly. No one is perfect, especially not me.

We are in a great period in tennis viewing, and it has gone on for a complete decade, with amazing consistency. You have to give credit to all of these players who play their hearts out and give us so much entertainment in the process.

What's so amazing is the distinct personalities of the Big 4. They have carried the game with class.

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
Well, I guess we have different opinions about that one general hercules.  Can't agree on everything, right?  ;D ;D ;D

For me, he is currently about the same tier level as John Newcombe, Boris Becker, Stefan Edberg, and Mats Wilander, just a step below the all time great players. 

But his career is not done yet, so he can still rise.  1 or 2 more majors should do it for me.  Doesn't need to win at Roland Garros, but it wouldn't hurt.  If not, I'd like to see him at least win Wimbledon or the US Open again.  I think another Australian Open won't do it for me.

Respectfully,
masterclass

I agree, masterclass. Nole is not there just yet for me either, mostly based on his lack of longevity. While he has done some amazing things, his "reign" has been relatively short, starting in 2011. To be considered up there with the likes of Federer and Nadal, he should at least get into double digit slams.

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
I hear ya general masterclass.


when considering what nole is up against, he has done quite well. he has had to deal with Federer, rafa, and andy murray.


that is big time competition.


as for RG, I don't think it will happen this time for nole. rafa will use those 4 losses in a row to be properly motivated and properly focused to deal with nole at RG.


also this is the last card rafa has left to play: he loses the king of clay title to as well as his #1 rank both at the same time if he allows nole to win in paris.



finally betting against rafa at a RG final is just a bad bet.  rafa has to try to hold on to his conquered territory and I believe he will. it is his last stronghold.


he will not allow the final to go beyond 4 sets if he faces nole in the final. that is how I am seeing it.

Even if Nole were to win the French, at any time, I don't think that would take away Nadal's King of Clay title. Rafa has too many amazing stats that make up that title. After the Rome final, this was only Nole's fourth win against Nadal on clay, so that isn't enough, IMO.


  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
Yeah, I'm not sure about Nole at Roland Garros.  I'm not sure he'll make the finals.  But let's see what the draw is like.  He has had some pretty good draws lately.  Too good, sometimes.  In some cases it has hurt him, I think.  Not enough semi-tough opponents before facing very tough opponents.

As for Rafa, he has to get past the QF.  Once he does, he'll have his 20 matches, and I think it will be tough for anyone to beat him over 5 sets.  Before that, especially early, a good clay player might upset him, even in best of 5, just because he hasn't played enough.  It is what I'm most worried about for him. 

It's not a confidence thing, it is staying at a high enough level throughout a match, which only comes after playing enough matches.  I think of it like this: One lapse during a 3 set match and you can survive, it might cost you a set, two can cost you the match.  5 sets gives you 2 lapses of survival, 3 can hurt you.  The question is that during his early matches can he keep the lapses down to 2 or  under?  Depends who he plays and how he and they play, obviously.  He is having some difficulty holding his serve, especially in key moments.  That also has to stop.

About 2 1/2 days till the draw general. :)

Respectfully,
masterclass

I'm not sure about Nole either. Like Rafa, he hasn't had that many matches either.
 
Rafa does have to stop with these lapses, but when you consider how long he's maintained such a high level I always cut him and Federer a bit of slack.

It's not fair to try to take either one of them down, especially when you consider their longevity and the quality of tennis they have given us for such a long time. And the reality is that Nole is coming in on the tail end of their dominance, it's easy for him to look good.

But, what about all of that time that those two were battling it out for supremacy? Personally, I think people are giving Nole too much credit. He is, IMO, just now paying his dues. He has not arrived just yet.

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile


I look Rafa's looks. He is so funny to me.

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
Did you guys see this? I can't say that I'm surprised.

Golf-Distraught McIlroy calls off Wozniacki wedding

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/golf-mcilroy-announces-wozniacki-split-092926902--golf.html


  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 722
  • Karma: +1773/-0
    • View Profile
Well, I guess we have different opinions about that one general hercules.  Can't agree on everything, right?  ;D ;D ;D

For me, he is currently about the same tier level as John Newcombe, Boris Becker, Stefan Edberg, and Mats Wilander, just a step below the all time great players. 

But his career is not done yet, so he can still rise.  1 or 2 more majors should do it for me.  Doesn't need to win at Roland Garros, but it wouldn't hurt.  If not, I'd like to see him at least win Wimbledon or the US Open again.  I think another Australian Open won't do it for me.

Respectfully,
masterclass

I agree, masterclass. Nole is not there just yet for me either, mostly based on his lack of longevity. While he has done some amazing things, his "reign" has been relatively short, starting in 2011. To be considered up there with the likes of Federer and Nadal, he should at least get into double digit slams.

You'll get no argument from me, Lady TT.  I think that longevity comment is spot on. 

They do have different career trajectories.  Rafa was very precocious early on, much like Borg.
At 19, he had already won his first slam and hasn't stopped through 2013, winning 4 majors at RG before winning his first major on grass in 2008. In 2009 he added a hard court major in Australia.  He's won an incredible 8 titles at Roland Garros and his last major so far was at the 2013 US Open.

Roger didn't win his first major till just under 22 years of age, and then rolled on from there, amazingly averaging close to 3 majors/year for 4 years straight and winning his last major so far in 2012 at Wimbledon at a month shy of his 31st birthday.

Novak Djokovic broke through at just under 21 years of age at the Australian Open in 2008, but then struggled to return to the winner's circle in the company of two of the all time great players already mentioned.  He finally broke through again 3 years later in 2011 at the same venue, and had his peak year, winning at Wimbledon and the US Open, then winning his last major so far at  2013 in Australia as well.

But Nole has time yet.  We will see if he can take advantage of Federer and Nadal's decline before declining himself and before others rise.  Declines also have different trajectories, some steady and slow, some precipitous, some up and down, so we can usually only judge those once their careers are over.

Respectfully,
masterclass
Legends of Tennis

  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 3876
  • Karma: +7784/-0
    • View Profile
Well, I guess we have different opinions about that one general hercules.  Can't agree on everything, right?  ;D ;D ;D

For me, he is currently about the same tier level as John Newcombe, Boris Becker, Stefan Edberg, and Mats Wilander, just a step below the all time great players. 

But his career is not done yet, so he can still rise.  1 or 2 more majors should do it for me.  Doesn't need to win at Roland Garros, but it wouldn't hurt.  If not, I'd like to see him at least win Wimbledon or the US Open again.  I think another Australian Open won't do it for me.

Respectfully,
masterclass

I agree, masterclass. Nole is not there just yet for me either, mostly based on his lack of longevity. While he has done some amazing things, his "reign" has been relatively short, starting in 2011. To be considered up there with the likes of Federer and Nadal, he should at least get into double digit slams.

You'll get no argument from me, Lady TT.  I think that longevity comment is spot on. 

They do have different career trajectories.  Rafa was very precocious early on, much like Borg.
At 19, he had already won his first slam and hasn't stopped through 2013, winning 4 majors at RG before winning his first major on grass in 2008. In 2009 he added a hard court major in Australia.  He's won an incredible 8 titles at Roland Garros and his last major so far was at the 2013 US Open.

Roger didn't win his first major till just under 22 years of age, and then rolled on from there, amazingly averaging close to 3 majors/year for 4 years straight and winning his last major so far in 2012 at Wimbledon at a month shy of his 31st birthday.

Novak Djokovic broke through at just under 21 years of age at the Australian Open in 2008, but then struggled to return to the winner's circle in the company of two of the all time great players already mentioned.  He finally broke through again 3 years later in 2011 at the same venue, and had his peak year, winning at Wimbledon and the US Open, then winning his last major so far at  2013 in Australia as well.

But Nole has time yet.  We will see if he can take advantage of Federer and Nadal's decline before declining himself and before others rise.  Declines also have different trajectories, some steady and slow, some precipitous, some up and down, so we can usually only judge those once their careers are over.

Respectfully,
masterclass

Glad we agree, and I know that people are quick to be dismissive, but the tennis gods couldn't have scripted a better rivalry than what we've had with Federer and Nadal. The tennis was absolutely sublime and IMO, (and I only started watching in the 80s so I can't speak before that), but I thought Pete and Andre's battles couldn't be topped. However, Fedal was a whole 'nother level, because to that point nobody played like either one of these guys, to me. Andre wasn't enough of a contrast, but here you had Federer having to deal with an upstart with topspin out the wazoo.

Thinking back, that's crazy, and Fed had to be the pioneer.

It's easy to say how good Player X is, but in reality you have to beat people at their pinnacle, not after ten years on the tour, after they're both worn down from a decade of dominance. Personally, I think it's an unfair comparison, similar to those who say Lleyton and Marat beat Pete in his later years. Uh yeah, but that's understandable. After so long on tour and being the most studied guys, what do you expect?

If you don't beat them at the peak of their powers, it doesn't count as much, IMO.  But, I'm also not going to be unfair to Rafa, because he had to battle Roger when he was still young and green in addition to his peers who were only lagging one year behind him. So, and this is my opinion, I'm not having it from the Johnny-come-latelys.

This is why I have lost respect for Nole as a player. He was there for the last ten years too, and he only started making a mark in 2011, so him acting like he's doing something, to me is laughable. You don't let two warriors battle it out for six or seven years and then come in and get the spoils and iin the process try to stand on someone else's chest. It doesn't work that way, at least not in my book.

  • Administrator
  • CAMELOT FANTASY
  • **********
  • Posts: 28948
  • Karma: +38077/-0
  • CAMELOT: DAWN OF JUSTICE
  • Location: New Orleans
    • View Profile
    • Camelot Fantasy
que pasa sports fans.

 

+-Recent Topics

Divine Metamorphoses And Friends: General Chat And Welcome Center by Clay Death
November 29, 2025, 07:32:12 pm

Miscellaneous poems created by EquineAnn by Horsa
September 12, 2025, 07:09:16 am

DaddysKitten Fantasy by DaddysKitten
August 03, 2025, 01:58:53 pm

SHALL WE DANCE (VIDEO) by Divine Metamorphoses
May 04, 2025, 04:00:41 am

Cutie’s by Divine Metamorphoses
May 02, 2025, 12:23:52 am

DIVINE METAMORPHOSES POETRY by Divine Metamorphoses
May 02, 2025, 12:21:38 am

Birthday Celebrations Palace by Divine Metamorphoses
May 01, 2025, 09:01:00 pm

Easter by Divine Metamorphoses
May 01, 2025, 08:58:52 pm

🎼Divine's eclectic tastes by Divine Metamorphoses
May 01, 2025, 08:57:23 pm

Adi's Maple Leaf Music Stop by Divine Metamorphoses
May 01, 2025, 08:55:27 pm