CAMELOT FANTASIES

Nah... we wouldn't be able to have debates on Sampras being great on clay...

I never said Sampras was 'great' on clay. I said Sampras wasn't as bad as some Fed fans (yes, that's right) make him out to be. By his own standard, it wasn't great but if we judge it by normal standard, then winning 3 clay titles (one being Rome Masters), reaching RG semi once, and qtr final 3 times isn't too shabby. Add to the fact that, he had beaten the likes of Bruguera, Courier, Muster at RG and others like Agassi, Corretja, Kafelnickov outside RG but on clay. That's pretty good whether someone admits it or not.

Also, mind you, I am one of the Admins here and I can totally edit your post and make it to MY likings. Next time you come here you will see your own post says, "I love Sampras so much. I think he was great on clay." lol :p