this is why Camelot has become required reading for the world.
there are opposing but very objective views here.
I think federer still has a massive game. I have been saying that for months now.
That's what discussion is supposed to be about; opposing views. Each side presenting their case without trying to convince the other.
If Person A makes valid points, Person B may learn something from them that eventually leads to a softening of their opinion.
That's the only way that it can work.
Many times at TW I was able to understand another person's perspective based on how they presented it.