I understand your position Lady TT.
Having a slight or even greater prejudice or bias is pretty normal for fans in any sport, after all the word "fans" comes from the word "fanatic", and it's almost expected that one's views would be slanted in a certain direction. As long as those points of view can be expressed without demeaning or insulting other points of view, then perhaps a reasonable discussion might take place.
But it is also acceptable to say nothing on the matter.
I for one, though, would be eager to hear your or any other reasonable opinion on the subject in this topic, as you said, thought provoking.
It doesn't only have to pertain to the poll question. That's just the "candy", so-to-speak. There are many things that can be discussed in this topic. For example, the different players styles, and their natural weaknesses Or, to what extent did the players on the list try to accomplish the feat? Early on, it may not have even been thought of as a feat worth sacrificing other things. Even the players that accomplished it can be brought into question. Were they fortunate to have completed a career slam? Or was it just a product of their game and overall ability?
Respectfully,
masterclass